Geopolitische Zeitenwende

    Die geopolitische Zeitenwende ist längst mehr als ein Schlagwort: Die USA und China ringen um Einfluss, Russland stellt die europäische Sicherheitsordnung infrage, und Staaten des globalen Südens treten selbstbewusster auf. Gleichzeitig geraten alte Bündnisse, Handelswege und internationale Institutionen sichtbar unter Druck.

    Aber erleben wir wirklich eine neue Weltordnung – oder nur eine besonders unübersichtliche Phase, in der am Ende doch die alten Machtblöcke dominieren? Und welche Rolle sollte Europa dabei spielen: enger an die USA rücken, strategisch eigenständiger werden oder sich stärker auf wirtschaftliche Interessen konzentrieren? Was meint ihr dazu?

    We can no longer rely on the United States as a partner, at least as long as people like Trump are in power. So Europe has no choice but to become more independent—both strategically and economically.

    But economically in particular, further problems are also coming our way—problems that we had completely lost sight of because of old "certainties" and "alliances." ENERGY, in every form. Oil and gas—not for heating, but for industry. Not far from me is the Leuna chemical park, directly connected to the Russian pipeline. The pipeline is dry, and deliveries have to be made via indirect routes. That is expensive. The situation in Schwedt is similar. The steel industry is also suffering from the high energy costs.

    A few years ago, COVID brought us to a standstill. In short, I would say: What kind of crazy times are we living in?

    Recently, there was an incident involving a drone (equipped with explosive material) at Halle/Leipzig Airport. There are constant cyberattacks. Today I stumbled across a fake video that tried to convince me that Germany was being divided again.

    At the moment, so many global and local catastrophes are raining down on us at once—how do you set the right priorities? We will not be able to handle everything all at once.

    This post has been automatically translated.

    Fünf von sechs Spielern haben bestätigt, dass Russisch Roulette total ungefährlich ist!

    Energy is where the decisive issue lies: strategic autonomy does not just mean replacing Russian gas with LNG from the United States. That merely swaps one dependency for another. Europe needs a mix of renewable energy, grids, storage, hydrogen—and, during the transition, probably reliable gas and oil supply contracts as well. For the chemical and steel industries in particular, “more wind turbines” alone is not an adequate answer.

    But Micha is right about the old certainties: for a long time, energy was treated as a given. The question is whether Europe is prepared to pay for this resilience as well. If we truly want strategic independence, states and companies would probably have to spend more on domestic production and long-term supply chains—instead of always opting for the cheapest supplier.

    This post has been automatically translated.

Participate now!

Don’t have an account yet? Register yourself now and be a part of our community!

Register Yourself Login