SPD parliamentary group leaders call for review of AfD ban

  • Why only now? Still, at least the issue does seem to be on some people’s minds after all.

    I’ve been calling for an examination for a long time. Have you?

    PRÜF HEUTE — SCHÜTZ MORGEN! - PRÜFt rechtsextreme Parteien!
    PRÜF HEUTE – SCHÜTZ MORGEN! PRÜF-Demo am 10.10.: Alle Parteien, die vom Verfassungsschutz als rechtsextremer Verdachtsfall oder gesichert rechtsextrem…
    pruef-demos.de

    An application to initiate proceedings for review before the Federal Constitutional Court may be submitted only by the Bundestag, the Federal Government, or the Bundesrat. We consider pursuing this route through the Bundesrat to be the best way to secure a majority for the application.

    PRÜF calls on the Bundesrat to submit an application to review right-wing extremist parties to the Federal Constitutional Court. A majority is required for this, which is reached with 35 of the 69 votes.

    This requires 35 of the 69 Bundesrat votes. Bremen, Hamburg, Schleswig-Holstein, and Berlin are already on board. That means there are “already” 14 votes. But that’s still not enough!

    That’s why I’m glad that the SPD is finally taking a stand as well.

    As a reminder, here once again are more than 5,600 pieces of evidence showing that the AfD is an anti-constitutional party:

    AfD-Verbot der Bundesregierung | Die Beweise
    Beweissammlung des Bundeskanzlers für ein Verbot der Partei Alternative für Deutschland.
    afd-verbot.de

    This post has been automatically translated.

    Ich kaufe ein "F" und möchte lösen: 🔳uck A🔳D!

Participate now!

Don’t have an account yet? Register yourself now and be a part of our community!